As part of revisiting top-rated works of science fiction, I read Atwood's The Handmaid's Tale, a novel I had deliberately avoided upon its release in the 1980s. My reservations proved justified. The text is less a plausible work of speculative fiction than a polemical outburst against misogyny in human society.
Atwood's imagined dystopia in "Gilead," set implausibly in Maine, mirrors elements of life under repressive regimes in Somalia, Uganda, or Mali, where women today face forced subjugation, violence, sexual exploitation, and ritual mutilation. Yet Atwood's fictional setting fails as credible social critique because its economics, military structure, and theocratic politics collapse under even minimal consideration. The "world-building" is poorly constructed, driven more by ideological hostility than by disciplined extrapolation of political or social trends.
As a lifelong advocate for women's rights and careers, I find Atwood's mode of attack counterproductive. Shallow caricature and theatrical dystopianism do not advance feminist or humanist thought; they trivialize serious injustices by surrounding them with absurd scaffolding. The result is a deeply unconvincing vision that masquerades as insight. 1/5 stars.
No comments:
Post a Comment