I was particularly impressed by Sapolsky’s willingness to follow evidence into uncomfortable territory. His ethical and political judgments are frequently conspicuous and extreme, and I occasionally found his interpretations colored by those commitments. Yet he generally allows empirical evidence to complicate conclusions he would apparently prefer to reach. I found those tensions more intellectually valuable than a supposedly neutral presentation would have been: the data are often more interesting precisely because they resist his moral framework.
The examples are intrinsically fascinating, but the greatest value for me was the conceptual framework. Sapolsky replaces simplistic explanations with layered causal interactions, making familiar questions about human behavior considerably more complicated and, consequently, more interesting. I highly recommend the series.
5/5 Stars

No comments:
Post a Comment